Constructing Research Questions and Hypotheses from the Objectives

After thoroughly and comprehensively reviewing the background of the study and the problem statement, the researcher should set the study's goal. It enables the researcher to be mindful of and adhere to the limitations of the research design, literature review, investigated data, and subsequent data analysis techniques. It clarifies the study's goal and keeps the researcher from straying from its purpose. There are some factors in defining the study's goal listed as follows:

The study's goal should be divided into two distinct sections: the purpose of the study and the research objectives. The research objectives are more explicit, detailed, and strongly articulated. It should be clearly articulated and directly tied to the variables found throughout the investigation; in contrast to the study's purpose, it is more general. Let's take a look at the following purpose of the study:

Specifically, the study is conducted to fulfil the following objectives:

The claims that the research seeks to fulfil are known as research objectives. It provides guidelines for what the study should indicate and outlines the investigation in measurable words. The research objectives also serve as recommendations for setting the activities required to be carried out in the research process. The scope of the study, the suggested research methodology, anticipated findings from the investigation, and the potential targetted audience should all be stated in a well-written purpose and research objectives.

There are four types of research objectives:

The details of the research problem you highlighted in your study should be closely tied to your research objectives. The research questions may not need to be stated clearly in your report, but the research objectives should be structured so the readers can infer the research questions from your objectives. The connecting words, whether or if, and a modal auxiliary such as "would" or "could" is added to the verb if the inferred research question is a yes-or-no query. Let's look at the example below:

When the inferred research question is an information question, and if or whether is omitted, an infinitive or noun phrase is used.

The problem statement generates research questions and hypotheses tested using inductive and deductive approaches. Translating the research problem into a particular requirement for investigation is known as a research question. It is a query regarding a research topic that may be addressed by researching it; for example, a corporation made the following statement to define a training challenge: The purpose is to discover the best way for the firm to teach present and future workers about networked personal computers. The following research questions arose from this issue statement:

A research question needs to be far more specific than a research topic by dividing it into several sub-questions. One way to formulate useful sub-questions is to frame "Wh" questions related to the study. Review the crucial characterisation, justification, and exploration for more specific "What?" or "To what extent..." sub-questions. Asking "Why?" questions helps demonstrate the value of the knowledge, ensuring that your work is pertinent to the topic. The sub-questions "How?" "Where?" and "When?" show the viability of your research.

The research questions should answer the purpose in general and the research objectives specifically. To answer the sub-questions, you need to consider how realistic your ideas are, review the key factors and variables, and think about how sure your research is valid. For instance, if you were researching secondary school kids' motivation, you might look at many forms of intrinsic, extrinsic, integrative, and instrumental motivations. Typically, one research question suffices for a single research project.

Effective research topics should be realistic, clear, significant, and ethical. Feasibility guarantees that the research can be adequately explored in terms of time, effort, and resources. The meaning of the keywords in the clear research questions is generally understood and accepted easily. Significant studies are worth looking into since they will advance human understanding and welfare.

By taking ethical issues into account, the research conducted will not cause any bodily or psychological harm to people, the environment, or the surrounding community. To formulate an excellent research question, do take into account the following:

There are two categories, and each category has three types of research objectives:

Each possible research question must be tested to determine whether it is feasible. Thus, you need to get down to a question you can answer. Before committing to a research question, check the available literature and resources. Consider the practicalities of your work and ensure that your research is manageable. Think deliberately about what new information your readers will learn from your research topic. Consider also how you can collect data and evidence, and spend some time exploring your ideas to prevent finding yourself at a dead end.

The research question is the foundation for planning and carrying out the study, even if it is rarely included in the final report. After narrowing your attention to a certain study area, create a question that focuses on a particular facet of the area of interest; for example, consider a researcher who wants to learn more about how industrial pollution affects the local plant life. In that instance, he or she might ask a query similar to this:

The same subject might be covered by a different question if phrased another way:

Problem statement identification aims to explain the research questions clearly and have well-formulated hypotheses. After stating the problem statement and examining the literature, the quantitative researcher is ready to formulate a hypothesis. It is an unverified claim or assumption that tentatively explains specific facts or events, which is also a powerful tool in scientific inquiry. It enables researchers to relate theory to observation and observation to theory. Below are some characteristics of a good hypothesis:

The terms research questions and hypotheses are interchangeable. Both express relationships; however, research questions are in the form of queries, whereas hypotheses are declarative. One significant distinction is that hypotheses are often more precise than research questions. Hypotheses are empirically testable assertions. Here is an example of a hypothesis: Graduates with better results will be given greater employment opportunities.

When conducting formal research, it is vital to create a statement of expected results, referred to as the hypothesis. The hypothesis is a potential answer to the research question. For instance, a hypothesis based on the inquiry might be as follows: Grain production is unaffected by the environment's abnormally high levels of sulfuric acid. Writing research questions in the form of hypotheses has pros and cons.

A hypothesis can also be as simple as an informed guess or prediction based on the connection of two or more factors. It is analogous to proposing a feasible answer to the research problem. Researchers typically formulate research questions as hypotheses so that they may be empirically tested. In other words, they may be tested through research methods like surveys and observations. If the forecast is empirically correct, the research can confirm it. Below are the purposes of the hypothesis:

A hypothesis can be derived inductively from the observations of behaviour or deductively from theory or previous research findings. An inductive hypothesis is a generalisation or explanation from apparently observed relationships from behaviours and trends; for instance: Students' learning of coding increases their logical thinking skills development. Here is the process for a researcher to formulate an inductive hypothesis:

On the other hand, a deductive hypothesis is derived from theory. It generally leads to new knowledge based on the meaningful framework incorporated into the body of knowledge within the theory. It accumulates by building on the existing body of facts and theories. A theory is a set of interrelated constructs and propositions that specify relations among variables to explain and predict phenomena. It is more general than hypotheses, which may give rise to some hypotheses to investigate in different studies. There are 12 types of hypotheses as follows:

A hypothesis can be expressed in two ways: null or alternative, which can be further divided into either directional or non-directional. The null hypothesis (H0) is used when the hypothesis is presented negatively and shows no difference or relationship between variables. It is used to assess whether the apparent relationship between variables is genuine or is likely to be a function of chance. The retention of a null hypothesis indicates that the evidence is insufficient.

Alternative hypothesis (H1) or significant or substantive hypothesis shows a relationship between two or more variables. The experiment's goal is to ascertain whether or not the hypothesis is either accepted or failed to be accepted. Below are examples of null and alternative hypotheses:

There are two types of alternative hypotheses: directional and non-directional. A directional hypothesis is a prediction where the result is implied, and the specific nature of the relationship that a researcher hopes for will emerge in the study; for example, treatment A is more effective than treatment B. On the other hand, the non-directional hy[hypothesis is a prediction where the direction of the result is not implied; for example, There is a difference in the test scores between treatment A and treatment B.

Although hypotheses are recommended to serve several important purposes, they are not essential in all research studies. They are treated as tools in the research process, not ends in themselves. It is difficult to formulate a meaningful hypothesis if the researcher lacks insights in the following cases:

Many theories are discarded after being empirically tested. The evidence does not support their assumptions. If the data collected does not support the hypothesis, it does not mean the study is failed. Throughout the history of scientific research, hypotheses that were not supported far outnumbered those that were. Unconfirmed ideas are an anticipated and important component of the scientific process that can cause theory to be reconsidered or revised and produce new hypotheses, bringing science closer to a true explanation of the condition of events.

Only the null hypothesis can be directly tested by statistical procedures to test a hypothesis. Testing a hypothesis involves the following steps:

To share your thoughts by commenting on this post, kindly sign up as a member by filling in your details in the Contact below.